Santa Clarita Valley History In Pictures
> CITY OF SANTA CLARITA
Santa Clarita Cityhood? First Public Forum
Canyon Country, California

January 13, 1987 — Santa Clarita City Formation Committee holds its first public forum at the Skate 'N Place, 21616 Soledad Canyon Road. Voters approved cityhood November 3, 1987.

Photos by Gary Thornhill/The Signal.



Click to enlarge.

[Brief.]

The cityhood movement is going public.

Cityhood backers will hold the first of a series of public forums at 7:30 p.m. Tuesday at the Skate 'N Place, 21616 Soledad Canyon Road.

Cityhood Formation Committee Chairman Carl Boyer will discuss revenue sources, whether local taxes will increase and what he sees as the benefits of incorporation.

The cityhood steering committee will be on hand to answer any questions.

Future cityhood forums will be held on the second and fourth Tuesday of each month at the Skate 'N Place site.

"The bottom line is the pocketbook," said cityhood spokesman Connie Worden, referring to the most commonly asked questions about incorporation.

"If we couldn't pay for the city I'd champion a cause for no city at all," she said.


Cityhood Backers — Who Are They?


Click to enlarge.

When Carl Boyer moved into his Santa Clarita Valley condominium in 1967, he thought he had found a quiet residential neighborhood.

That was before he learned of a developer's plan to build an auto dealership on the residentially zoned vacant land across the street.

Having received no notice of the plan change, Boyer found out about the county Planning Commission hearing on the proposal at the last moment — and spent the next three years fighting it downtown

"It was a business of taking repeated days off from work," Boyer recalls.

Today, he brings up that experience to explain his involvement in the move to form the City of Santa Clarita.

Boyer's dissatisfaction with having to deal with a "local" government 35 miles away is typical of the motivations of the baker's dozen of people who comprise the cityhood steering committee.

The committee's members cite the desire for local control, hearings held here at night, better planning and more consistent enforcement of land plans as the major reasons for forming a city.

Although he effort is nonpartisan, the cityhood committee's members are mostly Republican. They come from all over the SCV.

The financial feasibility of the proposed city, which would encompass the communities of Newhall, Saugus, Valencia, Canyon Country and Castaic, is now being formally reviewed by the county's Local Agency Formation Commission, in accordance with state law. Public hearings on the proposal will be held early this spring.

City backers, loath to wait for the county's hearings, will be holding their own public forums, starting Jan 13.

The forums are part of a stepped up drive to gain visibility for the movement, ending a yearlong period during which steering committee meetings were closed and press coverage was, if not shunned, not actively sought.

The low-profile first phase of the city campaign, in which signatures were collected on a petition to LAFCO, led to uncertainty in some quarters about the motivations of its backers.

Developers in particular feared that cityhood could stop growth. City backers deny the charge.

"I'm definitely not a negative-growth person," said Jim Schutte, co-chair of the cityhood committee and owner of Canyon Lumber & Hardware.

"I can't be, in the business I'm in," added the 44-year-old Canyon Country resident. "I would just like to see a bit of planning to go with the growth."

The phrases "planned growth," "controlled growth" and even "slow growth" are sprinkled throughout the conversations of city backers, but "no-growth" has so far not made an appearance.

Jill Klajic, of Canyon Country, said the drive for cityhood is "not an anti-growth movement at all — it's controlled growth, organized growth."

Louis Brathwaite, 53, a Valencia resident and former Hart School District board member, said his principal reason for supporting cityhood is the desire for local control.

"I feel that the area is growing, and that growth should continue," Brathwaite, the owner of a computer furniture firm, said.

"However, the people who are affected by that growth should have more of a direct say about it."

Glo Donnelly of Valencia, 42, who with her husband Art acts as fundraiser for the committee, agreed.

"It's easier to get to city councilmen than it is getting to the Board of Supervisors or the Regional Planning Commission or any of those agencies," said Donnelly, who operates a Newhall insurance agency with her husband.

Carla Swift, 39, a Canyon Country resident who assists cityhood spokesman Connie Worden with public relations, said SCV residents "just need someone close by that understands why we moved out here. We moved out here to get out of the crunch.

"We're getting railroaded out here," she added. "People go down to try to represent their community, and they get insulted."

Other recurring themes in the interviews with city backers were the county's apparent lack of coordination between road-building and tract-building, and the increased visibility of a city at higher levels of government where major road projects are approved and funded.

"It's going to give us a heck of a lot better representation with the county and the state," said Boyer, a 49-year-old Newhall resident.

Bill Roberts, 58, an Auto Club district manager who has spent years on the Chamber of Commerce transportation group lobbying for local road projects, said cityhood would allow SCV taxpayers a "better accounting" of where their road dollars are going.

In addition, said Donnelly, "We'll be keeping more of our tax dollars in our community."

"We need to continue to develop and we need to continue to grow ... but the related services, the roads and sewers, ought to be addressed," she said.

"There hasn't been as much forethought and planning for that enormous amount of growth as there could have been."

Lou Garasi, 52, who serves with Schutte as committee co-chair, said roads "don't necessarily have to go in before the houses, but typically, the way it's been handled in the past is the houses are built and then the traffic jams build up."

The county has made some progress in the last four years by establishing benefit assessment districts, but things move too slowly, he said. It took eight years to build the Bouquet Canyon bridge, and the Whites Canyon hookup with Via Princessa — the first of a series of major road improvements planned by the county — to be completed this spring should have gone in four years ago, he said.

"I think under local control we could do it probably faster and more cost-effectively, and that would make it easier for everyone concerned," Garasi said.

Connie Worden, spokesman for the cityhood committee, acknowledged that a city would not be the solution to all the SCV's gripes.

"Roads will never be easy," Worden said.

Garasi said he would wait until LAFCO's report before drawing final conclusions about the benefit of cityhood.

"I'm not supporting cityhood at all costs," he said.

But, he added, echoing other committee members, "I think we're large enough economically and population-wise to become a city."

Boyer, the high school teacher who won his fight with the Planning Commission, agreed.

"Most of all, we're ready for self-government," he said.

"This idea of being a colonial outpost of Los Angeles County has got to stop."


Gary Thornhill About the photographer: Photojournalist Gary Thornhill chronicled the history of the Santa Clarita Valley as it unfolded in the 1970s, '80s and '90s. From car races in Saugus to fatal car wrecks in Valencia; from topless beauty contests in Canyon Country to fires and floods in the various canyons; from city formation in 1987 to the Northridge earthquake in 1994 — Thornhill's photographs were published in The Los Angeles Times, The Newhall Signal, The Santa Clarita Valley Citizen newspaper, California Highway Patrolman magazine and elsewhere. He penned the occasional breaking news story for Signal and Citizen editors Scott and Ruth Newhall under the pseudonym of Victor Valencia, and he was the Santa Clarita Valley Sheriff Station's very first volunteer — and only the second in the entire LASD. Thornhill retained the rights to the images he created; in 2012, he donated his SCV photographs to two nonprofit organizations — SCVTV and the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society — so that his work might continue to educate and inform the public.


GT8702: Download original images here.
SANTA CLARITA
CITY FORMATION

thumbnail

Santa Clarita at 30

thumbnail

FULL BOOK

• G. Reynolds Story


thumbnail

Press Kit 10-14-1985

thumbnail

Membership Form ~1985

thumbnail

Cityhood Application 12/17/1985

thumbnail

Boundary Map 1/2/1986

thumbnail

Cityhood Petition #1, 1986

thumbnail

Pre-Cityhood Chamber Meeting ~1986

thumbnail

Formation Committee Logo 1987

thumbnail

First Public Forum 1/13/1987

Poll Results: Cityhood (Feb. 1987)


The Case for Cityhood (Presentation to LAFCO, 2-25-1987)


thumbnail

Arthur Young Report 9-18-1987

thumbnail

Cityhood Campaign Office

Storyboard: TV Commercial 1987


thumbnail

Inauguration Program 12/15/1987

thumbnail

Audio Recording of First City Council Meeting 12/15/1987

thumbnail

Incorporation Night Slide Show 12/15/1987

Post-Election Voter Registration Drive 12-1-1987


thumbnail

Jo Anne Darcy | Legacy

thumbnail

Carl Boyer | Legacy

History of the Push for Self-Government, Connie Worden-Roberts, 1999


RETURN TO TOP ]   RETURN TO MAIN INDEX ]   PHOTO CREDITS ]   BIBLIOGRAPHY ]   BOOKS FOR SALE ]
SCVHistory.com is another service of SCVTV, a 501c3 Nonprofit • Site contents ©SCVTV
The site owner makes no assertions as to ownership of any original copyrights to digitized images. However, these images are intended for Personal or Research use only. Any other kind of use, including but not limited to commercial or scholarly publication in any medium or format, public exhibition, or use online or in a web site, may be subject to additional restrictions including but not limited to the copyrights held by parties other than the site owner. USERS ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE for determining the existence of such rights and for obtaining any permissions and/or paying associated fees necessary for the proposed use.
comments powered by Disqus